Elsevier’s response to depositing articles in E-LIS

Recently I decided to explore E-LIS, an independent, international, open access repository of information (articles, papers, presentations, syllabi, etc.) relating to library and information science, with the goal of depositing some of my material there. One of the first things I wished to deposit was articles I had written for the journal, Serials Review, published by Elsevier. My sense was that Elsevier’s recent policy change for author copyrights allowed this but upon reviewing the terms again, I began to have doubts. Below is an email I sent to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, who forwarded it on to Elsevier for comment and a response:

“Recently I thought about the possibility of self-archiving articles I’ve published in SR in an OA repository such as E-LIS. I thought that this was specifically permissible under terms of copyright agreed to by Elsevier sometime back in 2004. However when I went over the conditions and terms it seems to me that this permission is institution-specific. In other words, if I worked at [XYZ University] and [XYZ University] had an IR then I could deposit any articles I’ve written for SR there with no problem. Can you tell me specifically if depositing them in a third party repository such as E-LIS is in violation of Elsevier’s terms?”

Today I received Elsevier’s formal reply:

“…Elsevier policy permits authors to post a personal version of the final paper on a personal site or their institute’s website. You are correct in assuming that we do not permit posting of the papers in a third party repository.”

I am not a happy camper. This is an arbitrary distinction, in my view, particularly since I no longer have a direct institutional affiliation. (An email conversation on this issue with Peter Suber, author of the Open Access News blog as well as the SPARC Open Access Newsletter, confirmed this.) At the very least such contractual language as exists should be enhanced to make this distinction clear. It certainly isn’t clear now. Just fyi, below is the specific language from Elsevier regarding an author’s right to deposit a personal copy of his or her article in an institutional repository (taken directly from Elsevier’s Author Gateway website > Getting Published > Copyright Information section) with the relevant passage highlighted:

“As an author, you retain rights for large number of author uses, including use by your employing institute or company. These rights are retained and permitted without the need to obtain specific permission from Elsevier.
the right to make copies of the article for their own personal use, including for their own classroom teaching use;
the right to make copies and distribute copies (including through e-mail) of the article to research colleagues, for the personal use by such colleagues (but not commercially or systematically, e.g. via an e-mail list or list serve);
the right to post a pre-print version of the article on Internet web sites including electronic pre-print servers, and to retain indefinitely such version on such servers or sites – see also our information on electronic preprints for a more detailed discussion on these points.
the right to post a revised personal version of the text of the final article (to reflect changes made in the peer review and editing process) on the author’s personal or institutional web site or server, with a link to the journal home page (on elsevier.com);
the right to present the article at a meeting or conference and to distribute copies of such paper or article to the delegates attending the meeting;
for the author’s employer, if the article is a ‘work for hire’, made within the scope of the author’s employment, the right to use all or part of the information in (any version of) the article for other intra-company use (e.g. training);
patent and trademark rights and rights to any process or procedure described in the article;
the right to include the article in full or in part in a thesis or dissertation (provided that this is not to be published commercially);
the right to use the article or any part thereof in a printed compilation of works of the author, such as collected writings or lecture notes (subsequent to publication of the article in the journal); and
the right to prepare other derivative works, to extend the article into book-length form, or to otherwise re-use portions or excerpts in other works, with full acknowledgement of its original publication in the journal.
Other uses by authors should be authorized by Elsevier through the Global Rights Department, and authors are encouraged to let Elsevier know of any particular needs or requirements.”

  • http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html <![CDATA[Stevan Harnad]]>

    As a google search on “amsci 3rd-party central” will reveal, a lot of water has flowed under the bridge on this topic since the inception of the American Scientist Open Access Forum. Here’s one summary posting:

    “Central versus institutional self-archiving” (Nov 2003)
    http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3209.html

    In a nutshell: partly out of genuine worry about free-riding 3rd-party publishers taking advantage of liberalized OA-green policies, and partly out of a genuine misunderstanding of the Net, the Web, and of OAI interoperability, publishers are more reluctant to endorse author self-archiving in central 3rd-party than in author’s own institutional repositories IRs or personal websites.

    The solution, of course, is for authors to self-archive in their own IRs and simply let central services harvest the metadata and the links. The only cases this does not cover are unaffiliated authors, but the solution there is simple too: A “personal website” is simply some disk-space and connectivity provided by an Internet Service Provider (ISP). Universities have a long tradition of providing haven for unaffiliated scholars. They can offer them a sector in their IRs and label it the “personal website” of the unaffiliated author in question.

    End of story. There is really literally no more to it than that, other than empty semiology.

    This should take care of cases like the one recently reported by Steve Oberg in his blog http://www.familymanlibrarian.com/?p=1057 and then blogged by Peter Suber in Open Access News ttp://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006_03_12_fosblogarchive.html#114270529670682491

    Steve had asked Elsevier — a publisher that is 100% green on author self-archiving — whether 3rd party sites were ok too, and Elsevier replied no.

    Now it seems to me Steve has some really obvious options: He can *blog* his article in his own blog (a blog is provided by an ISP as a “personal website”) and simply deposit the metadata and the URL in the central repository he had meant to self-archive the paper in: E-Lis http://eprints.rclis.org/

    Or he can do the same from a personal website — or approach a kindly institution to provide a personal website.

    All these variants just amount to silly make-work, of course, and will vanish quickly of their own accord as self-archiving grows, and the real meaning of depositing something on the web — and what comes with the territory — becomes more familiar to all.

    But for now, if our objective is take make our findings OA immediately, rather than to waste still more time making a fuss, we should just get on with it…

    Stevan Harnad
    American Scientist Open Access Forum
    http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html

  • http://oalibrarian.blogspot.com <![CDATA[Heather Morrison]]>

    hi Steve -

    As one of the volunteer editors of the international E-LIS Editorial Team, I very much appreciate your comment. You might want to check out my comments on OA Librarian at http://oalibrarian.blogspot.com/2006/03/elseviers-response-to-depositing.html. You’ll find a pointer to Peter Suber’s post and comments on Open Access News from here as well.

    My advice for you as an author in future: look for the OA policy before deciding where to submit your paper. DOAJ lists 57 OA LIS journals so far – not necessarily including the newest titles, such as evidence-based librarianship.

  • http://oalibrarian.blogspot.com <![CDATA[Heather Morrison]]>

    This is a reply to Stevan Harnad’s comment. There is great inequity for researchers if archiving is limited to institutional repositories. For example, in British Columbia, at present there is only one fully operational institutional repository. Within the next few years, I anticipate that there will be OA IRs at all the large university libraries. However, this will still leave the faculty or professional at other organizations – librarians at public libraries, medical professionals outside the teaching hospitals, and many others – without an OA repository.

    Posting to one’s blog or personal website – good advice for immediate impact for the author in this situation – is simply not the same. So far, I am extremely impressed with Google’s blog service – however, as far I am know google has not made any commitment to maintain my work there forever. A personal website could easily disappear with a change in employment, personal move, or change of ISP provider. An author without an IR does not have equitable archiving services, unless these are covered in publishers’ policies.

  • <![CDATA[Anita Coleman]]>

    Read this article: Coleman, Anita (2006) Self-Archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-Ranked Library and Information Science Journals. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1082/

  • <![CDATA[Steve]]>

    Thank you all for your helpful comments. I’ve decided to go ahead and deposit a preprint of the article in question in E-LIS as it seems pretty clear that that is allowable.

    Anita, thank you for the reference to your JASIST article, which was interesting to read. I would point out the significant omission of the peer-reviewed journal, _Serials Review_, from your list of Elsevier’s LIS journals. (See p. 16 for mention of a list of all Elsevier LIS journals.)