This post is a response to the buzz surrounding a recently published ranking of the top 25 library blogs. Frankly such measures, like the college rankings published by U.S. News & World Report, all depend on what criteria are used and how they are ranked. I’m not going to quibble at all with this particular list, mainly because I don’t really care about it.
What I do find interesting about the response to this ranking is that there seems to be a certain thread in the chatter relating to whether or not this blog or that one is deemed popular. I have this sense that there are those who think this is a big part of their blogging — that is, a hope to be popular, to be widely read. I think, honestly, this is the wish of just about anyone who blogs. What I find objectionable though is the idea that popularity equates to better. It doesn’t. And frankly, if you’re in it for popularity, I don’t think I really want to read your content. It is partly due to this that I have decided to unsubscribe from some of the “popular” or A-list library blogs. Sour grapes? No, I don’t think so.