A brief review of blog traffic for the past year

I don’t pay as much attention to blog traffic for FML as I probably should. I know there are a lot of things I could improve if I paid more attention to the various details. Instead, I tend to look for trends and broad numbers and that’s about it.

This evening I checked summary statistics from Google Analytics for the past year. Here is what I found:

  • There were 6,713 unique visitors to the site, which averages out to about 18.4 visitors per day
  • Visitors tend to spend only about a minute on the site each visit
  • The browser used by visitors breaks down as follows:
    • Internet Explorer – 46.51%
    • Firefox – 41.53%
    • Safari – 9.65%
    • Mozilla – 1.02%
    • Netscape – .48%
  • Traffic sources include 38.36% of visitors who find FML via search engines; 31.68% who go directly to the site (in other words, the site is bookmarked or the URL is typed in directly); and 27.42% of traffic comes from referring sites. Of the 38.36% of visitors who find FML via a search engine, the vast majority of them uses Google (over 80%).
  • The vast majority of visitors uses Windows as their operating system (80.45%). 17.93% use Mac OS X. 1.38% use Linux.

I am especially pleased at the good showing for non-IE browsers. Something else that is of interest is what keywords people use in a search engine that leads them to FML. Here are some of the top keywords, aside from the obvious ones such as “family man librarian”: “portable browsers”, “everyone has a double”, “library related wordpress theme” and “praise you in the storm.”

[tags]blog traffic, google analytics[/tags]

Google Talk embedded in GMail: I like it!

I’ve praised Google in the past for many of their easy to use, free services. Among these are GMail, Google Talk, Google Maps, Google Earth, and Google Analytics. I especially like the fact that these services, already good to begin with, get better over time. The latest example is embedding Google Talk within GMail. This new service just became active on my Gmail account earlier today. I like it!

On the other hand, I’ve played around with Google Reader a lot and have reluctantly abandoned it. It just doesn’t cut it in comparison to Bloglines, at least, not yet. I also think Google Video stinks. And despite all the hype, Google Base doesn’t do anything for me.

This blog highlighted by Answers.com

Once a day I try to check site traffic reports from Google Analytics, looking especially for new and interesting geographic origins for visitors to this site. One of the pieces of this free service from Google is a summary of referral sites (what they call “Visits by Source”). I happened to notice that a new source for visitors came from librarians.answers.com. Out of curiosity, I navigated to that site just to see where or how visitors to Answers.com were led here, to this blog. I was surprised to see that this blog is highlighted there among a relatively small group of other, more well known librarian blogs. Cool! See the list here. I can only posit that my blog came to the attention of someone at Answers.com due to a mention of their service in a previous post some time ago. Still, it’s nice to be recognized in this way.

Blog visitors: some interesting facts and figures [Updated]

I’ve been using Google Analytics since mid-November 2005 to gain some knowledge about who visits this blog, how much traffic it generates, and from where. It’s not a perfect tool but hey, it’s free and it’s easy to use. I’ve read that others question the results given to them by Google Analytics and I think it is a good policy to try to track usage in more than one way (e.g. by adding in analysis of server logs, depending on whether your ISP provides access to that kind of information).

It’s now been about two months since I put in place the necessary tracking code. Here are some interesting facts and figures that I’ve come up with so far:

  • the site averages about 21 visitors each day (interestingly, that corresponds exactly to the number of subscribers it has on Bloglines)
  • about 37% of visitors are recurring and 63% of them are new during that two month timeframe
  • visitors come from all over the world, including (as far as I can tell) the following countries: the U.S., Canada, Australia, Great Britain, Sweden, Germany, Norway, Spain, France, Israel, Hungary, and Poland.
  • visitors find their way here mainly via Google, Technorati, or by entering the URL to this site (what Google Analytics terms ‘direct’)

I have seen steady growth in access these last few months. The traffic this site gets (and therefore its ‘impact’) is quite low, but that’s fine with me. It’s just kind of fun to know a bit about visitors, especially where they come from.

[Update: For reasons I don't quite understand yet, I discovered this a.m. that if I look at Google Analytics results for this site on a weekly basis, I get different results than if I choose to view the results for the complete length of time I have had Google Analytics running (approximately since mid-November 2005). The above statistics are derived from a two month summary rather than from analyzing results week by week. One major difference is the fact that a much larger number of countries are sources for visitors to this site than I had previously believed. These include China, Indonesia, Brazil, New Zealand, United Arab Emirates, Philippines, Romania, Italy, Netherlands, India, Vietnam, Mexico, Switzerland, Belgium, Thailand, Venezuela, Argentina, Peru, and Czech Republic. I think this is pretty incredible geographic coverage for a very low traffic, English language site, and it gives real meaning to WORLD Wide Web.]

Opening yourself up to the world

There is still a lot of debate about the usefulness and longevity of blogs. I can see both sides, i.e. that blogs can be dangerous, erroneous, harmful; and that blogs can be very beneficial, informative, and useful. One aspect to blogging that has also been discussed is its effect on one’s job or future job prospects. There was a good article about this in The Chronicle of Higher Education some months ago that resonated with me. Basically, the author advised against blogging, period, viewing it as detrimental in the job search process.

The reason it resonated with me is that I had recently been involved in a job interview (this was early last summer) in which the existence of this, my personal blog, played a significant role. This was a big surprise to me at the time, although it shouldn’t have been, I guess. Throughout the two day interview process at a private liberal arts university here in Illinois, my blog was mentioned several times. It even came up during the first meeting I had with members of the search process, when I met with two people from the library for an introductory meal the evening before the formal interview began. The next day during a part of the interview in which I met with other university (non-library) faculty, the topic of my blog came up again. I remember one faculty member brightly declaring to me, “I learned so much about you from your blog, including answers to questions that I could not have legally asked you in this interview! Oh, and by the way, you have wonderful children!” This, from a complete stranger, was rather weird and somewhat unsettling for me. Somehow I just didn’t think much about the possibility of someone Googling me and finding (and reading) my blog. The next day I was scheduled to give a formal presentation on a topic of my choice. I had had a topic in mind but after the comments about my blog, I decided to switch topics at the last minute to focus on blogs and blogging: what is a blog, how to create your own blog, uses of and implications of blogs and blogging for libraries. This was, in a way, an attempt to turn the tables on my interviewers. My audience consisted of students, staff, and librarians, about 10 or 12 people, including the library director. By the end of the session, each person there had created her or his own blog using Blogger. I thought it went well.

However, the upshot is that I was not offered the job. I have no idea what, if any, role my blog had in this library making that decision. But I do think that in some way, my blog did play a role, for good or ill, in how I was evaluated.

My point in telling this story is that I learned in that experience that you never know who might read your blog or when. I think I can confidently state that a personal blog can and does play a significant role in how people evaluate you, especially in job interviews. There is nothing I am ashamed of in what I’ve written here, but I do know that I have views and beliefs that many disagree with and might even feel threatened by. Does that mean I shouldn’t blog? No. But it does mean that I am far more aware of and careful about what I write in this blog. Like it or not, maintaining your personal blog is like opening yourself up to the world in ways that were not as easy to do in the past.

One final note: It is not easy to gauge the readership of one’s blog. Sure, you can get a vague idea from, say, how many are subscribed to your blog in Bloglines. Or you can use Google Analytics (a service which I really like) to obtain some idea of who, what, where, and when people are accessing your blog. But there is no single way to really know for sure, what the readership is. It’s a guessing game at best.

Lecture @ UIUC GSLIS

Yesterday I was able to go to UIUC GSLIS at the invitation of Kathie and Bill Henderson to speak to their Technical Services Functions class. (This is the same class that I teach in online form in UIUC GSLIS’s LEEP curriculum.) They’ve invited me every year for the past 14 years. Each time I go, I thoroughly enjoy the time with their students.

The topic of my talk was “The Times, They Are a Changin…or, How to Thrive in an Age of Chaos and Opportunity in Technical Services Librarianship.” What I try to do is give a quick overview of my career path thus far, and then focus on electronic resources as the “hot” area. We usually spend a lot of time talking about user expectations in this era of the Google Mindset, and how libraries are coping with the demand for online full-text while simultaneously struggling to manage the “traditional” collection. I demo’d the ERM system that we developed at Taylor, known as the Taylor Periodical Administration System (TPAS), and also talked quite a bit about OpenURL and metasearching technologies.

There are about 14 students in this class. Some years the students really get into a good discussion, while other times, they seem content just to listen to a lecture. I prefer interaction and was pleased that this year there were a lot of questions. Especially in recent years, students have expressed some apprehension about the future of technical services librarianship, or uncertainty about job prospects in this specialty. This topic came up tangentially in yesterday’s session. One student asked, given what we had been talking about in terms of the predominance of e-resources and vendor tools that libraries are stuck with, what is stopping vendors from selling or marketing directly to researchers? (We had also been talking quite a bit about Google Scholar.) I thought this was an excellent question. It really asks the question, are libraries relevant anymore? Why should libraries assume they are even part of the equation for information consumers? Have libraries given up way too much ground, ground that they can never expect to recover? Very interesting questions. We spoke about the decision made by libraries about 100 years ago to stop trying to do article-level analytics in their cataloging practice, and how that resulted in the whole development of vendor solutions in the form of abstracting and indexing tools. Those tools have then developed into online form in the last 20 years or so, and then have been developed further to provide aggregated full-text content. We have lost control (if we ever had it) of the means of access to our resources.

Overall it was a very stimulating time and I ran out of time trying to cover everything. I wish we had had all day!

The Henderson’s had made lunch and invited Linda Smith, Associate Dean and one of my former professors, to eat with us. It was nice to chat with them about various things. One of the things I noticed this time in my campus visit was that development of various areas of the campus continues at a rapid pace. Some areas are hardly recognizable anymore, they have changed so much since I was a student there.