I’ve been to my fair share of conferences, of all stripes and sizes. I have to say — and this may come across as arrogant — that I don’t get a whole lot out of most of them. A well known blog that I have been reading, called Lifehacker, recently posted about the issue of how to make conferences worth the trip and time. It’s worth reading and then thinking about ways in which you can improve your own conference experience.
A large part of my problem with conference attendance is that I am not the most sociable guy out there. Too many activities with complete strangers can leave me physically and mentally exhausted. (Even too many activities with friends has the same effect.) Another problem for me is that in my experience, too many conferences, particularly in the library world, consist of recycled speakers over and over and over again. While I have never attended them, judging by their publicly available conference schedules, two conferences that I think are pretty egregious in this area are Computers in Libraries and Internet Librarian. Every year it seems like they have the same people talk about variations on the same themes. That is a bit of a turn off. But admittedly I haven’t ever been so maybe my criticism isn’t valid in this case. But I have experience with many others that I actually have attended such as ALA, where this is true. A third complaint I have with conferences is that too much of the time speakers tout what they are doing and how innovative and the “latest and greatest” a certain thing is, and it isn’t. Too often, what I hear about at conferences is something that I already have experience with in my own library setting or know quite a bit about.
I want to go to conferences to learn new things, to hear more detail about things that I have only heard or read about, to stimulate my thinking beyond the boundaries of my own particular sphere of knowledge or work experience. I want speakers who challenge me, who are good presenters, who encourage attendee participation. I want the conference location to be accessible for non-conference activities if possible, to have pervasive (and FREE) wireless connectivity, and to provide ample opportunity for me to get away from it all for short periods of time to recharge my batteries.
One of the things I do when planning to go to a particular conference is to look closely at who is giving a particular presentation and not so much at the topic of that presentation. Maybe that seems odd but at this stage in my career, interesting topic + great speaker is the ideal but interesting topic + bad speaker is always trumped by not so interesting topic + great speaker.
I’m tired of the same old, same old at conferences. The thing is, conferences are really, really expensive these days. I think I have a right to have high expectations for something that I (or sometimes, but not always, my employer) am paying a lot of money to attend. We need new and innovative conferences models in the library world. From the conference organizer’s perspective, I fully realize how much work and effort go into making one successful, and how much can be ruined by pure chance (like bad weather). But I will continue to look for ways to get a better return on my investment. As a result of this outlook, for instance, I don’t ever bother going to an ALA event; they aren’t worth the cost at all to me.