Opening yourself up to the world

There is still a lot of debate about the usefulness and longevity of blogs. I can see both sides, i.e. that blogs can be dangerous, erroneous, harmful; and that blogs can be very beneficial, informative, and useful. One aspect to blogging that has also been discussed is its effect on one’s job or future job prospects. There was a good article about this in The Chronicle of Higher Education some months ago that resonated with me. Basically, the author advised against blogging, period, viewing it as detrimental in the job search process.

The reason it resonated with me is that I had recently been involved in a job interview (this was early last summer) in which the existence of this, my personal blog, played a significant role. This was a big surprise to me at the time, although it shouldn’t have been, I guess. Throughout the two day interview process at a private liberal arts university here in Illinois, my blog was mentioned several times. It even came up during the first meeting I had with members of the search process, when I met with two people from the library for an introductory meal the evening before the formal interview began. The next day during a part of the interview in which I met with other university (non-library) faculty, the topic of my blog came up again. I remember one faculty member brightly declaring to me, “I learned so much about you from your blog, including answers to questions that I could not have legally asked you in this interview! Oh, and by the way, you have wonderful children!” This, from a complete stranger, was rather weird and somewhat unsettling for me. Somehow I just didn’t think much about the possibility of someone Googling me and finding (and reading) my blog. The next day I was scheduled to give a formal presentation on a topic of my choice. I had had a topic in mind but after the comments about my blog, I decided to switch topics at the last minute to focus on blogs and blogging: what is a blog, how to create your own blog, uses of and implications of blogs and blogging for libraries. This was, in a way, an attempt to turn the tables on my interviewers. My audience consisted of students, staff, and librarians, about 10 or 12 people, including the library director. By the end of the session, each person there had created her or his own blog using Blogger. I thought it went well.

However, the upshot is that I was not offered the job. I have no idea what, if any, role my blog had in this library making that decision. But I do think that in some way, my blog did play a role, for good or ill, in how I was evaluated.

My point in telling this story is that I learned in that experience that you never know who might read your blog or when. I think I can confidently state that a personal blog can and does play a significant role in how people evaluate you, especially in job interviews. There is nothing I am ashamed of in what I’ve written here, but I do know that I have views and beliefs that many disagree with and might even feel threatened by. Does that mean I shouldn’t blog? No. But it does mean that I am far more aware of and careful about what I write in this blog. Like it or not, maintaining your personal blog is like opening yourself up to the world in ways that were not as easy to do in the past.

One final note: It is not easy to gauge the readership of one’s blog. Sure, you can get a vague idea from, say, how many are subscribed to your blog in Bloglines. Or you can use Google Analytics (a service which I really like) to obtain some idea of who, what, where, and when people are accessing your blog. But there is no single way to really know for sure, what the readership is. It’s a guessing game at best.

ALA = Democratic Party

I had a thought yesterday as I was struggling to articulate what pains me so much about the American Library Association (ALA) these days, especially as I read about the special screening of Michael Moore’s latest movie and Richard Clarke’s keynote address at ALA Annual in Orlando. There is absolutely no attempt at objectivity or even-handedness that I can see in these (and other) “progressive” moves on ALA’s part. Why do I dislike ALA so much? Well, how long do you have to read the litany of reasons ;-) I articulate some of those reasons below after having been very active in at least two major sections of ALA (LITA and ALCTS) for a number of years, after dealing with ALA Publishing and also participating in a search process to fill a position within ALA. In other words, these are not just the views of an uninformed outsider, but one who has participated and been involved. I also make these statements realizing that they are generalities, there are exceptions, as always.

Anyway, back to the thought I had: ALA is much like the traditional Democratic Party. It is an attempt to be all things to all people, which falls so far short of the mark, it’s ridiculous, due in no small measure to the litany of special interests that control and influence it. It is a bloated, overly expensive organization that, in my opinion and in my experience, fails to deliver real value to its members. It has some basic societal ideals that are laudable and good (freedom to read, equal access for all, and many others), but it never seems to truly deliver on its promises. It gets so caught up in “social responsibility” issues, rabid defense against what it terms censorship, and left wing radical agendas that it tends to miss the boat entirely when it comes to confronting and dealing with many important library issues such as funding, professional development, and others.

I decided a couple of years ago to call it quits. I did not renew my membership. I couldn’t afford it anymore, I couldn’t afford to travel to ALA conferences, and I just didn’t feel right about contributing to an organization that so blatantly disregards, and even attacks, my worldview. I have many colleagues whom I admire and respect (yes, some of them are those right wing radical evangelical Christians like me whom everyone loves to pillory) who continue to maintain their membership in this organization. That’s ok, and maybe I’m not taking the right step on this one. Maybe there is a need to continue to try to work within the system to change it for the better. I don’t know. Maybe I’ll change my mind in the future, but for now, I’m content with being out of that scene.